Dave Cross, 1st June 2018

NUT18: Academies, MATs, re-broker, rebrand or renationalise

Motion 11 dealt drew on the increasing evidence of financial mismanagement in Academy chains, with the specific scandal of Wakefield City Academy Trust particularly highlighted. Speakers talked of this case in terms of 'asset stripping the schools'. The speaker recommended using the Companies House website to gain details on this shocking case and see the extravagant salaries being payed to executives.

The seconder of the motion highlighted the lack of accountability in these chains and the blocking of anti-academy /critical voices getting onto governing bodies. The good news was there had been victories where an alliance of parents had succeeded in getting representation on governing bodies.

The tide could be turning as this year has seen the least number of conversions in the last 4 years. Local campaigns are forcing a questioning of academisation and this is a fight that needs to be taken up by every local association. There have been victories e.g. Newham where school governors voted down a move to turn their school into an academy. The union is ready to back sustained action. You realise how bad things are getting when official bodies like the Public Accounts Committee begin complaining things are wrong. The Government has even admitted that local authorities will remain a significant employer for the significant future. New Zealand has decided to end its flirtation with Charter Schools (similar model to academies) with their Prime Minister saying they were driven by ideology rather than sound educational principles.

There were speakers supporting the motion who spoke of draconian discipline of pupils and unacceptable staff conditions of service. The bad record of MATs on disadvantaged students was highlighted, half of all exclusions in academies are of SEN pupils.

One speaker drew attention to some of the backers of academies i.e. hedge funds and emphasised the ideology of profit from education was creeping in with big companies like Pearsons and Google looking for opportunities to make profits.

The message was schools are not an opportunity to make profits, but a public service and should be returned to LA and so be accountable to the communities they serve. Finally a speaker drew our attention to the fact that the DFE claims all academies act under strict accountability and the three Rs, to which they responded yes - repulsive, repugnant and reprehensible.


Related articles

NUT18: Global education and the education of girls in developing countries (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Supply teacher executive seat (1st June 2018)
NUT18: The role of retired teachers in the NEU (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Boycott high stakes, summative tests in primary schools (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Baseline Assessment (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Secondary Curriculum and Assessment (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Workload (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Supply teachers' employment (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Support for rural schools (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Use of data to set target grades for students, and appraisal objectives linked to performance-related pay for staff (1st June 2018)
NUT18: A child-centred curriculum and pedagogy (1st June 2018)
NUT18: A National Education Service (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Crisis in young people's health (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Job sharing of executive posts (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Speak up for libraries (1st June 2018)
NUT18: CEO Pay in Academies (1st June 2018)
NUT18: School Funding (1st June 2018)
NUT18: A report on the Presidential Address at the Annual Conference (NUT Section) 2018 (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Impressions of Conference by a first time delegate (1st June 2018)
NUT18: Michael Rosen (4th April 2018)
NUT18: The Housing Crisis (4th April 2018)
NUT18: Ofsted comments about the wearing of the hijab in schools (4th April 2018)


» More news